Transcendental argument for the existence of God

The Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God is the argument that attempts to prove the existence of God by arguing that logic, morals, and science ultimately presuppose a supreme being and that God must therefore be the source of logic and morals.
A version was formulated by Immanuel Kant in his 1763 work The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God, and most contemporary formulations of the transcendental argument have been developed within the framework of Christian presuppositional apologetics.

1. Transcendental reasoning
Transcendental arguments should not be confused with arguments for the existence of something transcendent. In other words, they are distinct from both arguments that appeal to a transcendent intuition or sense as evidence, and classical apologetics arguments that move from direct evidence to the existence of a transcendent thing.
They are also sometimes said to be distinct from standard deductive and inductive forms of reasoning, although this has been disputed, for instance by Anthony Genova and Graham Bird.

2. The argument
The TAG is a transcendental argument that attempts to prove that God is the precondition for logic, reason, or morality. The argument proceeds as follows:
Therefore, God exists. If He didnt, we could not rely upon logic, reason, morality, and other absolute universals which are required and assumed to live in this universe, let alone to debate, and could not exist in a materialist universe where there are no absolute standards or an absolute Lawgiver.
God is a necessary precondition for logic and morality because these are immaterial, yet real universals.
People depend upon logic and morality, showing that they depend upon the universal, immaterial, and abstract realities which could not exist in a materialist universe but presupposes presumes the existence of an immaterial and absolute God.
Cornelius Van Til likewise wrote:
We must point out. that univocal reasoning itself leads to self-contradiction, not only from a theistic point of view, but from a non-theistic point of view as well. It is this that we ought to mean when we say that we reason from the impossibility of the contrary. The contrary is impossible only if it is self-contradictory when operating on the basis of its own assumptions.
Therefore, the TAG differs from thomistic and evidentialist arguments, which posit the existence of God in order to avoid an infinite regress of causes or motions.

3. Reception
Some reject the validity of the argument pointing out various flaws, such as a category error involved in the first premise of the argument, namely that just because theres a statement thats universally true it wont make that statement a part of reality in itself. Another issue pointed out is that its not needed to have a god to have logic or morality. In particular the existence of multiple logic systems with differing axioms such as non-classical logic as well as multiple radically different moral systems constitutes evidence against the idea that logic and morality are actually universals. Furthermore, the existence of theorems like Goedels completeness theorem and the soundness theorems for classical logic provide justification for some logic systems like classical propositional logic without using any god hypotheses thus contradicting the first premise of the argument.

The existence of God is a subject of debate in the philosophy of religion and popular culture. A wide variety of arguments for and against the existence
A cosmological argument in natural theology and natural philosophy not cosmology is an argument in which the existence of God is inferred from alleged
Later, the teleological argument was accepted by Saint Thomas Aquinas and included as the fifth of his Five Ways of proving the existence of God In early
ontological argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of God that uses ontology. Many arguments fall under the category of the ontological
and therefore irrational for example, via the Argument from morality or via the Transcendental argument for the existence of God Russell s teapot
Omnipotence paradox Problem of evil Problem of Hell Theological noncognitivism Transcendental argument for the existence of God More... Antireligion Anti - Buddhism
the transcendental ideality of space and time. Kant s arguments for this conclusion are widely debated among Kant scholars. Some see the argument as based
The argument from morality is an argument for the existence of God Arguments from morality tend to be based on moral normativity or moral order. Arguments
Transcendental idealism is a doctrine founded by German philosopher Immanuel Kant in the 18th century. Kant s doctrine is found throughout his Critique
The argument from inconsistent revelations, also known as the avoiding the wrong hell problem, is an argument against the existence of God It asserts